(Andrey Rudakov/Bloomberg / Getty Images)

XAI launched Grokipedia in October last year, after Musk repeatedly criticized Wikipedia for bias against conservatives. The media then found that although many entries seemed to be copied directly from Wikipedia, Grokimedia also claimed that pornographic content aggravated the AIDS crisis, provided an “ideological defense” for slavery, and used derogatory expressions against cross gender groups.

For an encyclopedia derived from a chatbot that once claimed to be a “mechanical Hitler” and was used to spread deepfake pornographic content on the X platform, these contents may not be surprising. However, its information seems to be gradually spreading beyond Musk’s ecosystem – The Guardian reported that GPT-5.2 cited content from Grokipedia nine times in response to over ten different questions.

The Guardian pointed out that ChatGPT did not cite the source when asked about topics on which the false information of Grokimedia has been widely reported, such as the riots on Capitol Hill on January 6 or the AIDS epidemic. On the contrary, citations appear on more obscure topics, including statements about historian Richard Evans that The Guardian has previously clarified. Anthropic’s Claude model also referenced Grokipedia when answering certain questions. ）

A spokesperson for OpenAI told The Guardian that the company is committed to obtaining information from a wide range of publicly available sources and diverse perspectives.

Roger Luo said:This incident exposes a critical flaw in generative AI’s cross-system information integration: the absence of an effective fact-prioritization mechanism and a traceability verification framework. When algorithms indiscriminately absorb ideologically biased data sources, they not only distort the neutrality of knowledge dissemination but also risk systematically polluting the foundation of public understanding.

All articles and pictures are from the Internet. If there are any copyright issues, please contact us in time to delete.

Inquiry us [contact-form-7]

(How X’s “Content Awards” Recognize Excellence in Various Categories)

The program recognizes excellence in different content areas. Winners showed exceptional creativity and engagement. Categories included sports, tech, lifestyle, and news. Each winner displayed unique skill and impact.

X launched this initiative to celebrate its diverse community. The company wants to highlight valuable contributions. Creators drive conversation and culture on the platform. Recognizing them is important for X.

Winners gain recognition from X and their peers. This acknowledgment helps creators reach bigger audiences. The awards also motivate others to produce quality work. X believes good content benefits everyone.

The selection process involved internal review. X teams looked at content quality and audience reaction. They focused on originality and positive influence. Winning creators represent the best of X.

(How X’s “Content Awards” Recognize Excellence in Various Categories)

This effort supports X’s goal to foster meaningful sharing. The company aims to build a vibrant online space. Rewarding creators helps achieve this mission. The Content Awards are part of that strategy.